martin mangard wrote:
> Hello
> You are right! This part of the patch is not necessary and is ignored
> if the AT91SAM9G20 is selected in the kernel configuration. I made
> this  change  during a test with another kernel configuration. Sadly
> this change was still present during the creation of the patch. The
> attached patch does not contain this part any more.

Applied, thanks.


Xenomai-core mailing list

Reply via email to