Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: > Jan Kiszka wrote: >> @@ -234,12 +239,65 @@ int xnheap_init(xnheap_t *heap, >> >> appendq(&heap->extents, &extent->link); >> >> + vsnprintf(heap->name, sizeof(heap->name), name, args); >> + >> + spin_lock(&heapq_lock); >> + appendq(&heapq, &heap->stat_link); >> + spin_unlock(&heapq_lock); > > You can not use a Linux spinlock in xnheap_init and xnheap_destroy: > - this breaks the build for the simulator; > - callers of xnheap_init and xnheap_destroy are not guaranteed to run on > the root domain.
Oh, yes, unfortunately. That callers appear to be fixable, but that's probably not worth it at this point. I will have to rewrite heap_read_proc to break out of nklock frequently. Also not nice, but less invasive. Jan
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Xenomai-core mailing list Xenomaifirstname.lastname@example.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-core