Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: > * rtcan: on blackfin we seem to have a conflict with rtcan. > The warning is about CAN_ERR_MASK, sure blackfin is a bit strange to > define this in core headers which are included everywhere. This said, > not prefixing a Xenomai symbol with something like XN seems to be asking > for trouble. Wolfgang, do you think it would be possible to rename the > symbols with such prefix? Or do you share some code with socket-can that > you do not want to touch?
CAN_ERR_MASK is part of the Socket-CAN interface (include/linux/can.h), it must not be called differently. Blackfin is obviously doing namespace pollution which should be fixed upstream and meanwhile worked around in Xenomai (e.g. via #undef CAN_ERR_MASK). Jan
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Xenomai-core mailing list Xenomaiemail@example.com https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-core