Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> * rtcan: on blackfin we seem to have a conflict with rtcan.
> The warning is about CAN_ERR_MASK, sure blackfin is a bit strange to
> define this in core headers which are included everywhere. This said,
> not prefixing a Xenomai symbol with something like XN seems to be asking
> for trouble. Wolfgang, do you think it would be possible to rename the
> symbols with such prefix? Or do you share some code with socket-can that
> you do not want to touch?

CAN_ERR_MASK is part of the Socket-CAN interface (include/linux/can.h),
it must not be called differently. Blackfin is obviously doing namespace
pollution which should be fixed upstream and meanwhile worked around in
Xenomai (e.g. via #undef CAN_ERR_MASK).


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Xenomai-core mailing list

Reply via email to