Jan Kiszka wrote: > Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: >> * rtcan: on blackfin we seem to have a conflict with rtcan. >> The warning is about CAN_ERR_MASK, sure blackfin is a bit strange to >> define this in core headers which are included everywhere. This said, >> not prefixing a Xenomai symbol with something like XN seems to be asking >> for trouble. Wolfgang, do you think it would be possible to rename the >> symbols with such prefix? Or do you share some code with socket-can that >> you do not want to touch? > > CAN_ERR_MASK is part of the Socket-CAN interface (include/linux/can.h), > it must not be called differently. Blackfin is obviously doing namespace > pollution which should be fixed upstream and meanwhile worked around in > Xenomai (e.g. via #undef CAN_ERR_MASK).
Ok. But according to the build logs, it is redefined in rtdm/rtcan.h. The error seems to have been fixed upstream, since we get this warning with 2.6.30 and not with 2.6.31. -- Gilles. _______________________________________________ Xenomai-core mailing list Xenomaifirstname.lastname@example.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-core