Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
>>> Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>>> The following changes since commit 
>>>> 113ea4d56e8b215cb56ae7673013163ea5a5987d:
>>>>   Gilles Chanteperdrix (1):
>>>>         switchtest: increase stack sizes
>>>> are available in the git repository at:
>>>>   git:// for-upstream
>>>> This is the first of likely three rounds of patches for 2.5.x. It mostly
>>>> deals with introducing rtdm_rt_capable to replace the
>>>> __xn_exec_conforming marks of RTDM syscalls and with deprecating RT
>>>> open/socket/close for RTDM devices. The latter affects quite a few
>>>> devices in our tree, so I'm CC'ing the maintainers to check if they see
>>>> any problems in dropping RT creation/closure at this point.
>>>> Besides some smaller fixes and an irqbench refactoring, this series also
>>>> contains a solution for the confusions about incompatible rttest<n>
>>>> devices. It simply avoids collisions be using different device names for
>>>> the different device subclasses.
>>> switchtest already used another solution for that problem: the different
>>> devices use different ioctls. So, IMO we already had a solution for that
>>> issue.
>> Look at the diffstat of switchtest. I wanted to fix the issue for the
>> rest without replicating code.
> I would agree with you for patches in xenomai-head. But in that case,
> this is an ABI breakage.

It's internal testing stuff.

If you think anyone out there may have written his own back- or
front-end, I could make all test devices additionally register under the
old rttest<n> as well. I just don't think it's worth the effort.


Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT T DE IT 1
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux

Xenomai-core mailing list

Reply via email to