Philippe Gerum wrote: > On Sat, 2010-05-01 at 19:47 +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote: >> Philippe Gerum wrote: >>> Don't you think that, quoting yourself: >>> >>> "I have to confess, I do not understand how the patch may relate to our >>> crash. But that's because I still only have a semi-understanding of this >>> frightening complex RPI code" >>> >>> does not fit that well with any kind of strong assertion made later on >>> the same topic, not backed by facts? >> See, as long as you do not directly explain why my concerns on this >> naturally racy construct were not valid (I brought up quite a few >> concrete questions), > > Which were answered. And you seem to consider that a construct is racy > by design without taking care of understanding why they could be > perfectly valid in the proper context. This is what I was pointing out, > all time long.
Depends on the POV. But what counts is the outcome of this, and that's a fix. Jan
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Xenomai-core mailing list Xenomaifirstname.lastname@example.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-core