Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: > Jan Kiszka wrote: >> Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: >>> Not being able to join a deleted task undermines seriously the utility >>> of rt_task_join... What is it useful for, then? >> See the doc: You join or delete, but not both. > > Looks to me like a workaround: you are not able to handle properly the > life-cycle of an RT_TASK, so you changed the rules... is there really no > other way?
First of all, it turns a SEGV into a proper error code. Moreover, rt_task_join now officially finalizes the object for native (it always did technically!), as does pthread_join for POSIX. No rule changed, just rule documentation and violation detection added. One may argue about join after delete, but for what use case such a change of rt_task_delete semantic? Jan
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Xenomai-core mailing list Xenomaiemail@example.com https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-core