On Tue, 2010-08-17 at 14:40 +0200, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> Krzysztof Błaszkowski wrote:
> > On Tue, 2010-08-17 at 14:33 +0200, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> >> Krzysztof Błaszkowski wrote:
> >>> Hello,
> >>>
> >>> I found recently that large application uses to segfault before fork()
> >>> leaves its glibc wrapper.
> >>>
> >>> I included here a test suite which can be easily used to verify what
> >>> goes wrong. It may be necessary to adjust makefile to compile the code.
> >>> So, the console is missing output from line #89. We can see instead a
> >>> message that getpid couldn't be linked which is 1st sign of memory
> >>> corruption.
> >>>
> >>> i used to think that this issue could be related to not unbinding heap
> >>> before fork() but it turned out that it is enough to link userspace with
> >>> xenomai libraries.
> >>>
> >>> I wonder if this is known issue and if there is any fix, does 2.5.4 work
> >>> same ? or maybe there is something wrong with the kernel i use (or adeos
> >>> patch)
> >>>
> >>> Another question is why rt_task_create() is marked deprecated in native
> >>> skin. Does it mean that native skin is going to be removed from source
> >>> tree ?
> >> The libc on the system you run the test is not the same as the one of
> >> the compiler. Please re-run the test when using the same libc on the
> >> test board as on the machine where you are compiling.
> >
> >
> > I reckon you missed the clue. On the other hand: how can you explain
> > that main process even started ? and only child failed ?
> >
> > and indeed i compile code on one box but run on another anyway both
> > rootfs'es are "bit equal".
>
> No. As witnessed by the message:
> ./xeno-shmem-fork: relocation error: ./xeno-shmem-fork: symbol getpid,
> version GLIBC_2.0 not defined in file libc.so.6 with link time reference
have you seen that main process started ? and linker didn't complain
about wrong symbol version. This happened only in child process after
line 88, have you seen output from line 89 ?
furthermore you can find commented out line in makefile which compiles
userland without linking with xenomai libraries.
this executable works as expected.
>
> The run-time glibc is not the same as the compile-time glibc. The glibc
> are mostly ABI compatible, but maybe not the fork wrapper, so, to rule
> this out, please re-run the test with the correct glibc.
>
this is from libc on box i compile code:
GNU C Library stable release version 2.9 (20081117), by Roland McGrath
et al.
Copyright (C) 2008 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions.
There is NO warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A
PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
Configured for i686-suse-linux.
Compiled by GNU CC version 4.3.2 [gcc-4_3-branch revision 141291].
Compiled on a Linux 2.6.27 system on 2008-12-03.
Available extensions:
crypt add-on version 2.1 by Michael Glad and others
GNU Libidn by Simon Josefsson
NoVersion patch for broken glibc 2.0 binaries
Native POSIX Threads Library by Ulrich Drepper et al
BIND-8.2.3-T5B
For bug reporting instructions, please see:
<http://www.gnu.org/software/libc/bugs.html>.
CHroot linux-e9um:/lib #
and this is from target box:
atest:/lib # ./libc-2.9.so
GNU C Library stable release version 2.9 (20081117), by Roland McGrath
et al.
Copyright (C) 2008 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions.
There is NO warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A
PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
Configured for i686-suse-linux.
Compiled by GNU CC version 4.3.2 [gcc-4_3-branch revision 141291].
Compiled on a Linux 2.6.27 system on 2008-12-03.
Available extensions:
crypt add-on version 2.1 by Michael Glad and others
GNU Libidn by Simon Josefsson
NoVersion patch for broken glibc 2.0 binaries
Native POSIX Threads Library by Ulrich Drepper et al
BIND-8.2.3-T5B
For bug reporting instructions, please see:
<http://www.gnu.org/software/libc/bugs.html>.
atest:/lib #
these libcs are same and i wonder whats wrong with you.
How many times do i need to make you sure that these libcs are binary
same ?
--
Krzysztof Blaszkowski
_______________________________________________
Xenomai-core mailing list
Xenomai-core@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-core
