Am 03.10.2010 01:35, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> Am 02.10.2010 10:45, Daniele Nicolodi wrote:
>>> On 02/10/10 08:40, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>>> The following changes since commit 
>>>> 5e7cfa5c25672e4478a721eadbd6f6c5b4f88a2f:
>>>>   nucleus/sched: fix rescheduling bit test macros (2010-09-30 02:34:27 
>>>> +0200)
>>>> are available in the git repository at:
>>>>   git:// for-2.5.x
>>>> Jan Kiszka (8):
>>>>       RTDM: Protect xnshadow_ppd_get via nklock
>>>>       Fix symbolic status ouput of root threads
>>>>       Create watchdog as non-blockable timer
>>>>       native: Improve documentation of rt_task_join and rt_task_delete
>>>>       x86: Add PCI ID of Series 5/3400 Intel chipset to SMI workaround
>>>>       x86: Add PCI ID of 631xESB/632xESB/3100 Intel chipset to SMI 
>>>> workaround
>>>>       x86: Add PCI ID of Intel ICH9M-E chipset to SMI workaround
>>> This patch reads:
>>> +#ifdef PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_ICH9_1
>>> +#define PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_ICH9_1 0x2917
>>> +#endif
>>> shouldn't it be #ifndef ... #define ... #endif instead?
>>>>       x86: Add PCI ID of Intel ICH9M chipset to SMI workaround
>>> Same for this one.
>> Indeed. Fixed in both branches, and I also cleaned up a typo in some
>> patch description. Updates pushed.
> Pulled thanks. So, if I understand correctly, we keep Wolfgang's work on
> clocks for 2.6?

Besides the fact that you were originally skeptical to merge this in
stable, we have no urgent need (we will require 2.6 for our next update
anyway - SCHED_OTHER fix...).

I will pull Wolfgang's Xenomai bits [1] into my for-upstream branch now
and send out a refreshed pull request. If you would like to see them in
2.5 as well, I could provide them for that tree too, of course.



Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT T DE IT 1
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux

Xenomai-core mailing list

Reply via email to