On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 02:03:34AM +0200, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: > the issue on ixp looks like the last one to be fixed on arm. If you have > time, could you try the following program? It makes a very basic test, > but not having a big-endian ixp at end, I am wondering about very basic > assumptions...:
~> armeb-unknown-linux-gnueabi-gcc -Wall arm.c arm.c: In function 'f': arm.c:7: warning: control reaches end of non-void function arm.c: In function 'g': arm.c:13: warning: control reaches end of non-void function and then # ./a.out f: ffffffff g: ffffffff > If you do not have time, do you agree for a revert of the KUSER_TSC code > to the one we had before, and which is working for you? I sorry about not getting back about this. I have had crunch trying to meet a deadline, but now that is over. Tomorrow I'm on the road, but next week looks good for IXP testing. And thanks, thanks, for all your good work, Richard _______________________________________________ Xenomai-core mailing list Xenomai-core@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-core
