On 06/22/2011 12:55 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2011-06-22 12:36, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
>> On 06/22/2011 11:26 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>> Hi Gilles,
>>> do you remember reasons for only pre-faulting the main thread's stack?
>>> The desire to avoid wasting resources by forcing all stacks into memory?
>>> I've the requirement on my table to provide a generic solution of all
>>> shadow threads. I think this should be possible using pthread_getattr_np
>>> and walking the stack page-wise, but I may miss some pitfall.
>> Last time I checked, only the main thread stack was mapped on demand.
>> Other threads have mmaped stacks, which are made present by mlockall,
>> so, do not need faulting.
> That's definitely not the case in general. Customer has just confirmed
> that pre-faulting thread stacks avoids first-access domain switches.

self-contained test case please.

> Jan


Xenomai-core mailing list

Reply via email to