On 2011-07-31 19:46, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> On 07/31/2011 07:42 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> On 2011-07-31 19:21, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
>>> On 07/31/2011 06:49 PM, GIT version control wrote:
>>>> +int rt_puts(const char *s)
>>>> +{
>>>> +  return print_to_buffer(stdout, 0, RT_PRINT_MODE_PUTS, s, NULL);
>>>> +}
>>>
>>> gcc for ARM chokes here: it says that NULL can not be converted to a
>>> va_list, however I try it.
>>
>> Hmm. Does this work?
>>
>> diff --git a/src/skins/common/rt_print.c b/src/skins/common/rt_print.c
>> index 186de48..52538d8 100644
>> --- a/src/skins/common/rt_print.c
>> +++ b/src/skins/common/rt_print.c
>> @@ -243,7 +243,9 @@ int rt_printf(const char *format, ...)
>>
>>  int rt_puts(const char *s)
>>  {
>> -    return print_to_buffer(stdout, 0, RT_PRINT_MODE_PUTS, s, NULL);
>> +    va_list dummy;
>> +
>> +    return print_to_buffer(stdout, 0, RT_PRINT_MODE_PUTS, s, dummy);
>>  }
>>
>>  void rt_syslog(int priority, const char *format, ...)
>>
>>
>> Not really beautiful as well, I know.
> 
> It seems to work now, but some later version of gcc may decide to warn
> us that this argument is used without being initialized...

Yes. I've pushed a cleaner version.

Jan

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
Xenomai-core mailing list
Xenomai-core@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-core

Reply via email to