On 2011-09-04 15:16, rainbow wrote:
> 2011/9/4 Jan Kiszka <jan.kis...@web.de>
>> On 2011-09-04 14:21, rainbow wrote:
>>> Is the ipipe patch the same as patch like
>>> adeos-ipipe-,
>> Except that the trace branch is for 2.6.35, yes. More precisely it is
>> now the same, I just pushed the latest version that includes two more
>> backported ipipe fixes.
>>> I know the latter is xenomai patch
>>> and after I patch it, I can see "Real-time sub-system  ---> " Option. But
>> If
>>> I use 2.6.35-x86-trace which contains ,there is no such option.
>> That menu option is introduced by Xenomai, ie. after running
>> prepare-kernel.sh. You likely forgot that step.
>> Yes,I forget the step. So I think I only have to run prepare-kernel.sh
>> --arch=x86_64
> --linux=2.6.35-x86-trace  , I do not need --adeos option because
>> the 2.6.35-x86-trace contains the ipipe patch.
>> Note again that you have to use a Xenomai tree with the required ftrace
>> patches on top if you want Xenomai to generate ftrace events as well.
>> "Xenomai tree with required ftrace patches on top" you mean the branch
> "remotes/origin/queues/ftrace"?

Yep. I just pushed a rebased version of current git master.


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Xenomai-core mailing list

Reply via email to