Thank you for so detailed answers!! I will test it.
2011/9/4 Jan Kiszka <jan.kis...@web.de>
> On 2011-09-04 15:16, rainbow wrote:
> > 2011/9/4 Jan Kiszka <jan.kis...@web.de>
> >> On 2011-09-04 14:21, rainbow wrote:
> >>> Is the ipipe patch the same as patch like
> >>> adeos-ipipe-126.96.36.199-x86-2.9-02.patch,
> >> Except that the trace branch is for 2.6.35, yes. More precisely it is
> >> now the same, I just pushed the latest version that includes two more
> >> backported ipipe fixes.
> >>> I know the latter is xenomai patch
> >>> and after I patch it, I can see "Real-time sub-system ---> " Option.
> >> If
> >>> I use 2.6.35-x86-trace which contains ,there is no such option.
> >> That menu option is introduced by Xenomai, ie. after running
> >> prepare-kernel.sh. You likely forgot that step.
> >> Yes,I forget the step. So I think I only have to run prepare-kernel.sh
> >> --arch=x86_64
> > --linux=2.6.35-x86-trace , I do not need --adeos option because
> >> the 2.6.35-x86-trace contains the ipipe patch.
> >> Note again that you have to use a Xenomai tree with the required ftrace
> >> patches on top if you want Xenomai to generate ftrace events as well.
> >> "Xenomai tree with required ftrace patches on top" you mean the branch
> > "remotes/origin/queues/ftrace"?
> Yep. I just pushed a rebased version of current git master.
School of Information Science & Engineering , Lanzhou University.
Do what you like,
Enjoy your life.
Xenomai-core mailing list