On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 7:31 PM, Gilles Chanteperdrix
<gilles.chanteperd...@xenomai.org> wrote:
> On 09/05/2011 07:14 PM, Henri Roosen wrote:
>> Hi Gilles,
>>
>> Unfortunately I didn't find the time to test this release yet. I'm
>> just wondering if there is a fix for this problem in the 2.6.0
>> release: https://mail.gna.org/public/xenomai-core/2011-05/msg00028.html
>
> This one is fixed, a bit differently, since we fixed the ppd handling so
> that the ppd is valid up to the end of a process.
>
>>
>> We are using the auto-relax patches on top of 2.5.6 for a long time
>> now. We found issues with it regarding auto-relax tasks that were not
>> being auto-relaxed anymore. Philippe made patches for that, see
>> https://mail.gna.org/public/xenomai-help/2011-03/msg00161.html.
>
> Philippe's patches for rt_task_send/receive/reply should have been
> merged too.
>
>> However, locally I reverted those two patches because these introduced
>> a memory leak in xnheap; I could only do rt_task_create()
>> rt_task_delete() for 1024 times ;-). I thought that was the discussion
>> of
>> https://mail.gna.org/public/xenomai-core/2011-05/msg00028.html at that
>> time and I don't recall a proper fix for it was provided. But I might
>> have missed it...
>
> This looks related to the ppd issue as well, in which case, it should
> have been fixed too.
>
> It would be nice if you could test the release and tell us whether you
> still have these issues.
>

I've now tested the issues on the Xenomai 2.6.0-rc1 release. Both
issues don't occur.

Thanks,
Henri

>
> --
>                                                                Gilles.
>

_______________________________________________
Xenomai-core mailing list
Xenomai-core@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-core

Reply via email to