Sebastian Smolorz wrote: > Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: > > Schlägl "Manfred jun." wrote: > > > Hi again! > > > > > > I've the presumption, there is something wrong with my timer-handling. > > > Could you please take a look at my handling. > > > > > > Thanks in advance! > > > > The problem I see with your code is that you are updating > > ns_timer_lxlost in __ipipe_mach_acktimer, the integrator architecture > > code, which also uses a decrementer does not do that. Apart from that, I > > see nothing wrong. > > I see another one which has to do with the fact that __ipipe_mach_tsc is > updated both in __ipipe_mach_get_tsc and __ipipe_mach_set_dec. This leads > to double-added ticks because the latter funcion is called only once a > period and the former even more than once. So Xenomai counts jiffies > in /proc/xenomai/timer to fast. Manfred, can you confirm this?
Forget this, my eyes weren't open this morning ... In __ipipe_mach_get_tsc there is no update of __ipipe_mach_tsc, of course. Sebastian _______________________________________________ Xenomai-help mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-help
