On Thu, 2007-01-18 at 21:09 +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote: > Theo Veenker wrote: > > Jan Kiszka wrote: > >> Theo Veenker wrote: > >>> Hi all, > >>> > >>> I need to run xenomai on a HP Compaq nc6320. I use kernel 2.6.17.14 > >>> and xenomai 2.2.5. The non-realtime kernel runs fine on this laptop, > >> > >> Means the same kernel with I-pipe (and Xenomai) disabled or the same > >> kernel version and .config, but unpatched? > > > > The latter. > > > >> > >>> but the xenomai pactched kernel gives several of these messages: > >>> > >>> IRQ routing conflict for xxxx.xx.xx.x, have irq 11, want irq 10 > >>> > >>> And some things (e.g. mouse, network) then don't work, not properly > >>> anyway. The same kernel runs fine however on other systems. > >>> > >>> Any clue what I can do about it? > >> > >> Please provide bootlogs for both rt and non-rt kernel startup. And the > >> .config. > > > > I 'solved' it by enabling ACPI (without processor module and others). > > Looks good. I don't see high latencies with the latency test. Under > > what conditions might ACPI affect real-time behaviour? > > CONFIG_ACPI_PROCESSOR, because it allows deep sleep states with > significant wakeup latencies. > > But back to your original issue: You mean your notebook booted fine > under vanilla Linux with ACPI disabled? That would mean I-pipe relies on > ACPI here without stating this anywhere. In that case /something/ needs > fixing: code, config deps, or doc. >
It doesn't, at least, not willingly. Before drawing any conclusion, please try 2.6.19 with the same configuration first: the generic irq layer may have had a positive influence on the I-pipe in this area. > Jan > > > PS: Please take care to not drop the list from CC. > > _______________________________________________ > Xenomai-help mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-help -- Philippe. _______________________________________________ Xenomai-help mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-help
