Philippe Gerum wrote: > On Fri, 2007-02-02 at 14:59 +0200, Rus V. Brushkoff wrote: >> :> Yes, 2.6.19-1.6-04 (without nowcow) has the same problem. But the >> :> interesting things is that reading /proc/interrupts in loop seems to >> :> silently eat kernel memory by small chunks too. I'm now trying on a >> :> vanilla kernel. >> :Confirmed. A vanilla 2.6.19 silently eats memory when >> :reading /proc/interrupts in loop. Mathias, could you please confirm this >> :on your box too? TIA, >> >> Tested on K8 x86_64 SMP and K8 x86 UP : SMP system leaks memory, UP >> doesn't. > > Thanks. I do have a leak on UP here though; vmstat or any other command > do not eat this memory (at least neither ps or top report any continuous > growth of their vm space while running the test), so I would wildly > guess that's a kernel-based leakage occurring somewhere in the procfs > support.
Must be .config-dependent. My UP box (.config attached) doesn't expose any leak on /proc/interrupt loops with 2.6.19.2. Jan
config.bz2
Description: Binary data
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Xenomai-help mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-help
