Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
Roland Tollenaar wrote:
Inspect /proc/rtcan or watch the log messages.
Then I presume I will send a message on 1 and then see it appear on
the rtcanrecv rtcan1 ?
Yes, but with rtcan2.
Does this not depend on the outcome of the earlier inspection of
/proc/rtcan or is rtcan2 an educated guess? To clarify: I will be
sending and recieving on rtcan2 in loopback mode in order to test?
The virtual can driver will install two devices. Have you seen something
different? If you then load xeno_can_peak_dng... The devices will be
named according to order they are installation, of course.
FYI, I just committed the following changes to the trunk:
2007-03-02 Wolfgang Grandegger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* include/rtdm/rtcan.h: Document CAN controller modes and remove
definition of SIOCGIFINDEX to avoid potential conflicts with the
corresponding definition in kernel header files.
* ksrc/drivers/can/sja1000/rtcan_peak_dng.c: add plug-n-play
support to ensure that the parallel port device is powered on
and do proper cleanup.
Wolfgang.
_______________________________________________
Xenomai-help mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-help
