On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 10:22 AM, Gilles Chanteperdrix
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 10:20 AM, Gilles Chanteperdrix
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 10:19 AM, Paradoxxa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Gilles Chanteperdrix schrieb:
>>>>
>>>> paradoxxa wrote:
>>>>  > Gilles Chanteperdrix schrieb:
>>>>  > > On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 4:28 PM, paradoxxa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>  > >    > >> Gilles Chanteperdrix schrieb:
>>>>  > >>      > >>> On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 3:04 PM, paradoxxa
>>>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>  > >>>
>>>>  > >>>        > >>>> Gilles Chanteperdrix schrieb:
>>>>  > >>>>
>>>>  > >>>>          > >>>>> On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 2:17 PM, paradoxxa
>>>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>  > >>>>>
>>>>  > >>>>>
>>>>  > >>>>> No, you are talking about CONFIG_DEBUG_LL, I am talking about
>>>>  > >>>>> CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO. These are two different options. So, this make
>>>> at
>>>>  > >>>>> least two options that you changed. Could you check if a kernel
>>>> with
>>>>  > >>>>> an unmodified defconfig boots ?
>>>>  > >>>>>
>>>>  > >>>>>
>>>>  > >>>>>
>>>>  > >>>>>            > >>>> The CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO is already set in the
>>>> defconfig. The
>>>>  > >>>> CONFIG_DEBUG_LL i
>>>>  > >>>> set manually.
>>>>  > >>>> As well I had to changed the  AT91 Master Clock Frequency.
>>>>  > >>>>
>>>>  > >>>> Here are the logs of a unmodified defconfig boot:
>>>>  > >>>>
>>>>  > >>>>          > >>> Ok. But this is a boot with your old compiler.
>>>> Could you try a
>>>>  > >>> defconfig build (with I-pipe AT91 master clock frequency modified)
>>>>  > >>> with CodeSourcery compiler ?
>>>>  > >>>  If you can not get CodeSourcery compiler to compile correctly a
>>>> Linux
>>>>  > >>> kernel, I can send you the 2007q3 compiler, or you could try to
>>>>  > >>> compile the kernel with your old compiler, and to compile
>>>> user-space
>>>>  > >>> with CodeSourcery compiler.
>>>>  > >>>
>>>>  > >>>        > >> I tried it with the both compiler. When i execute
>>>> /usr/xenomai/bin/latency i
>>>>  > >> get the message "sh: /usr/xenomai/bin/latency: not found"
>>>>  > >>      > >
>>>>  > > Have you tried running file, ldd, or readelf on the binary to see
>>>> what
>>>>  > > it is made of ?
>>>>  > >
>>>>  > >    > >> By the way, how i can figure out if the binary or the
>>>> compiler is a
>>>>  > >> oabi/eabi file/compiler?
>>>>  > >>      > >
>>>>  > > codesourcery compiles for eabi by default. So, you have to enable
>>>> eabi
>>>>  > > in kernel configuration to be able to run binaries generated by
>>>>  > > codesourcery compiler.
>>>>  > >
>>>>  > >    > The eabi was disabled in the kernel configuration. But to enable
>>>> it make  > no changes.
>>>>  >  >  > $ file usr/xenomai/bin/latency
>>>>  > usr/xenomai/bin/latency: ELF 32-bit LSB executable, ARM, version 1  >
>>>> (SYSV), for GNU/Linux 2.6.14, dynamically linked (uses shared libs), not  >
>>>> stripped
>>>>  >  >  > $ ldd usr/xenomai/bin/latency
>>>>  >     not a dynamic executable
>>>>
>>>> This is wrong. ldd should be run on the target, not on the host. Also
>>>> check that /usr/xenomai/lib is in the ld.so.conf on your target (and
>>>> that you have run ldconfig) or use LD_LIBRARY_PATH
>>>>
>>>>  >  > $ readelf --sections /usr/xenomai/bin/latency
>>>>
>>>> I was rather thinking about readelf -d /usr/xenomai/bin/latency
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> I actuall don't have ldd and readelf on the target. I did a ldconfig -p. The
>>> Xenomai Libraries were listed there.
>>
>> readelf can work on the host. But ldd on the target is the best way to
>> know if the installation worked correctly. If you are looking for ldd,
>> it is compiled as part of the glibc. You may even found it in the
>> toolchain files.
>
> Actually ldd is a script, it is not compiled.

All what it does is launching

LD_TRACE_LOADED_OBJECTS=1 /usr/xenomai/bin/latency

So, you do not even need the script.

-- 
 Gilles

_______________________________________________
Xenomai-help mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-help

Reply via email to