---- Paul <[email protected]> schrieb: > On Wednesday 18 August 2010, Stefan Kisdaroczi wrote: > > On 17.08.2010 17:24, Stefan Kisdaroczi wrote: > > > On 17.08.2010 15:51, Hemal C.Bavishi wrote: > > >> When I tried to compile it with the latest version of kernel with > > >> xenomai 2.5.4, I am getting following errors in Xenomai (disable > > >> CONFIG_SMP, enable CONFIG_X86_UP_APIC and CONFIG_X86_UP_IOAPIC > > >> (*).) > > > > > > Just tested, got the same build error with 2.6.34. > > > If I patch 2.6.34 with prepare-kernel [1] it compiles, > > > if I use the debian packaged patch generated with prepare-patch [2] > > > it fails. > > > > > > I guess a fix is needed in prepare-patch for 2.6.34, but no time to > > > look closer now. > > > > patch for prepare-patch.sh attached. > > prepare-kernel.sh try's to find ipipe.h and uses the old or new tree > > structure. Is it ok to change this unconditionally in > > prepare-patch.sh? All adeos-patches in xenomai-2.5.git have ipipe.h > > in > > arch/$linux_arch/include/asm/, so i think yes. > > As long as no one tries to include a patch for anything prior to 2.6.28 > (I think that is when everything moved to arch/*/include/asm) - There > is only one ipipe patch in head currently for 2.6.25-ppc, but I doubt > if anyone would be using it on a Debian build. > For that one case, I don't think it worth adding any additional > complexity to generate a patch with a limited life span.
It's a 2.4.25-ppc patch (note the 4) and the debian build includes only 2.6.* patches. from prepare-patch.sh: find $xenomai_root/ksrc/ -name "adeos-ipipe-2.6.*-$supported_arch-*.patch" Regards, Stefan _______________________________________________ Xenomai-help mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-help
