Dear Marten, In message <[email protected]> you wrote: > > Thank you for your answer. If I understood correctly the Freescale kernel > development has been added to the mailline kernel tree: > http://opensource.freescale.com/git?p=imx/linux-2.6-imx.git;a=summary > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=tree;f=arch/arm/mach-mx3;h=8021c7efda789b8fe5ae3e896b62ae125b231958;hb=795abaf1e4e188c4171e3cd3dbb11a9fcacaf505 > > Is this what you meant?
Oops? What makes you think so? There are ongoing efforts to get support for the i.MX family into the mainline kernel tree, but I don't see any of the Freescale LTIB code being added, nor can I see that Freescale updated their LTIB support to a recent version. The most recent LTIB version is tagged as rel_imx_2.6.35_11.01.00 (see http://opensource.freescale.com/git?p=imx/linux-2.6-imx.git;a=commit;h=27fdf7bae11978d21e8aba09bb635f49b07edd4a) which is based on a v2.6.35.3 kernel tree (i. e. 3 kernel versions behind), on top of which 744 Freescale-specific patches are applied. It is these 744 patches that make the difference between Freescale's LTIB tree amd mainline. It appears there is still a _long_ way to go, not to mention that they have to catch up for three versions. > Can you inform me on the particular things that need to be done (or point me > to the information), and what is approximately the development time needed. Time needed to develop what exactly? Best regards, Wolfgang Denk -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: [email protected] The ultimate barrier is one's viewpoint. - Terry Pratchett, _The Dark Side of the Sun_ _______________________________________________ Xenomai-help mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-help
