On 02/07/2012 01:01 AM, Eric Eric wrote:
> Hello, I've been doing some more Xenomai benchmarking lately and have come
> across what seems to be strange behavior. I'm running Xenomai 2.6.0 on a
> Beagleboard XM with kernel 2.6.37. Just running the in-kernel periodic
> task benchmark (./latency -t1) alone results in an average of 2.7uS
> latency. What is interesting is the effect of various parts of dohell:
>
> 1) If I just run unmodified dohell with only the seconds argument, the
> latency goes to about 17uS.
>
> 2) If I comment out all tests in dohell except for "dd if=/dev/zero
> of=/dev/null &", average latency goes to 3.3uS (with top indicating about
> 98% CPU usage by dd).
>
> 3) If I comment out all tests in dohell except for "while :; do cat
> /proc/interrupts; done > /dev/null 2>&1 &", average latency goes to about
> 24uS.
>
> So it seems that trapping into the Linux kernel can have a drastic effect
> on Xenomai real-time kernel latencies.
You are drawing conclusions a bit too fast. dd also causes a lot of
trapping into the kernel. If you are interested in knowing how the time
is spent, I suggest using the I-pipe tracer.
If you find an improvement of the I-pipe patch for your platform, we
will gladly welcome patches.
--
Gilles.
_______________________________________________
Xenomai-help mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-help
