2012/10/17 Luis Rossi <[email protected]>: > Thank you, > > I will take a try. I chose version 2.5.4 becouse it was stated as stable > for debian in the website. How about 2.6.1? > > Quick question, if i build the kernel inside a Virtual Box with linux (on a > x86) computer will i have any problem? I cant see any reason why i would, > but it is nice to check.
Do you want to execute Xenomai from a standard virtual machine? I believe that, at least, the real time results will not be reliable. > > Regards, > > On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 5:00 PM, Gilles Chanteperdrix < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> On 10/17/2012 09:22 PM, Luis Rossi wrote: >> >> > Hi i am trying to build a kernel with xenomai for debian and i am >> following >> > all the instuctions. >> > >> > The target PC will be an Intel Atom. >> > >> > I am usign xenomai version 2.5.4 with kernel 2.6.34 >> >> >> As we said many times, the ABI do not change in a branch, so, there is >> absolutely no reason to use Xenomai 2.5.4 and not Xenomai 2.5.6. And >> update to 2.6.1 is recommended. >> >> -- >> Gilles. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Xenomai mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://www.xenomai.org/mailman/listinfo/xenomai >> > > > > -- > Luís Filipe Rossi > Electrical Engineer > Biomechatronics Lab. / Grupo de Sensores Integráveis e Sistemas > Escola Politécnica > Universidade de São Paulo > Cel. +55 (11) 7662-9234 > _______________________________________________ > Xenomai mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.xenomai.org/mailman/listinfo/xenomai -- Flavio de Castro Alves Filho [email protected] www.linuxembarcado.com Twitter: http://twitter.com/#!/fraviofii LinkedIn profile: www.linkedin.com/in/flaviocastroalves _______________________________________________ Xenomai mailing list [email protected] http://www.xenomai.org/mailman/listinfo/xenomai
