On 01/15/2013 02:48 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2013-01-15 14:44, Philippe Gerum wrote:
On 01/15/2013 01:21 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2013-01-15 13:09, Philippe Gerum wrote:
On 01/15/2013 01:06 PM, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
On 01/15/2013 12:35 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:

On 2013-01-14 21:39, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
Done, also note that my current work is the for-core-3.5.7 branch, not
the for-core-3.5 branch.

Both branches point to the same commit ATM. I suppose you didn't push
the new for-core-3.5.7 version yet. Once done, I'll rebase my stuff on top.


Sorry, pushed.


Please everybody, make sure to eventually resync with my tree, this is
becoming a mess when merging your stuff here. TIA,

I'm fetching from you regularly, but your public tree contains no
changes for 3.5, sorry.


You must mean no change for 3.5.3 since the last stable pipeline release
I pushed out. I'm seeing several breakages when merging the very latest
work, I'm solving this with Gilles.

I mean that I have no clue what I should resolve. My branch was based on
your core-3.5 branch, the latest publicly available version. I've just
rebased it on top of Gilles' 3.5.7 queue - without any conflicts. So
what are you talking about?


I'm talking about conflicts in pgtable.h, apic.c with the atomic counter braindamage and stuff like this. I'm not asking you to fix anything in your tree, I'm pulling from Gilles' trees almost exclusively, and had issues with those. I raised an alert about painful merges happening lately, and a recommendation to avoid these. Gilles fixed the issue on his end, and the merge now resolves as a fast forward, as expected. Issue closed.

--
Philippe.

_______________________________________________
Xenomai mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.xenomai.org/mailman/listinfo/xenomai

Reply via email to