A Dilluns, 22 d'abril de 2013, Gilles Chanteperdrix va escriure: > On 04/22/2013 09:18 AM, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote: > > > A Divendres, 19 d'abril de 2013, Gilles Chanteperdrix va escriure: > >> On 04/19/2013 01:46 PM, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote: > >> > >>> [1] > >>> http://lists.mech.kuleuven.be/pipermail/orocos-users/2013- > > April/006986.html > >> > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> that link does not tell us why you need this option. And that would be > >> the most important information. > > > > :-) > > > > you are right. I have pointed vague information about that. The complete > > thread commented that some people are getting errors using orocos with > > xenomai. Orocos use intensively the plugin architecture. As you can see in > > this thread: > > > > http://www.orocos.org/forum/orocos/orocos-users/problem-orocos-under- xenomai > > > > some user point that the solution to load the plugin is to activate this > > option in xenomai libs. > > > >> If what you need to disable is TLS, then configuring xenomai with > >> --without-__thread is sufficient > >> > >> If what you need is to avoid the main thread shadowing, we are not going > >> to configure xenomai with --enable-dlopen-skins as it breaks otherwise > >> conformant applications, but we can add an environment variable like > >> XENO_PTHREAD_NO_AUTO_SHADOW to allow supporting both situations. > >> > > > > I don't know if this is a solution, it overpass my knowledge. I would like to > > put the detail that, under my subjective point of view, without numerical > > data, the orocos users (and cnc users) are the main users of the debian > > package. If, we activate that option and we solve this issue, no package > > recompilation are needed, that's all. > > > > I don't know the deep repercussion of that decision. Jan Kiszka said in > > another mail: > > > >> default is a micro-performance degradation (likely not an issue) and the > > lacking auto-shadowing of the main thread when using POSIX skins > > > > You are the main developers, your decisions are the most important, but I > > think that a lot of people activate that, at least the users that use that > > debian package. > > > The problem is that if we do not shadow the main thread, we break > programs that used to work, and also break programs for reasons which > are hard to understand for a new-comer. Hence the question, would not > --without__thread be sufficient for Orocos? Only an Orocos user has the > answer to this question. >
I don't know. Orocos use intensively the plugins architecture so I don't know if this could solve it. But, as another person in the list has pointed, if you would like to use the Python modules you need it too. I have asked to the Orocos main developer and I would try to test it, Regards, Leo -- -- Linux User 152692 Catalonia _______________________________________________ Xenomai mailing list [email protected] http://www.xenomai.org/mailman/listinfo/xenomai
