Our application for laboratory automation and experimental control (for 
neurophysiology labs) runs on QNX on commodity x86 motherboards (when we can 
find ones that don't have the SMM issue).  We do this because our users are on 
tight grant money at universities.

With QNX we measure typical 4usec and worst case maximum 6usec latency from 
#INTA asserted on the PCI bus to entry of a service routine in user space.  
This is when disk i/o, display updating, network activity all present.

We also execute another routine scheduled by a timer every 1msec that may 
involve updating the display and network communication to other machines.  The 
jitter for this routine is not crucial.

QNX has discontinued self-hosting on x86- they are embedded only now.  
Photon/PhAB is no longer supported.  So we are looking to port to another 
environment that is self-hosted on x86 perhaps using Qt instead of Photon.

>From what I've read on Xenomai the typical latency to entry of a routine in 
>user space initiated by a hardware IRQ would stay the same as with QNX, but 
>the maximum would be on the order of 20-40usec on x86?

Would the routine that is scheduled every 1msec be able to update displays and 
use TCP/IP?

Any advice would be appreciated.

Thanks,

Art Hays
National Institutes of Health
National Eye Institute
Bethesda, MD  20892







_______________________________________________
Xenomai mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.xenomai.org/mailman/listinfo/xenomai

Reply via email to