On 06.03.19 12:49, Roman Stratiienko via Xenomai wrote:
On Tue, Mar 5, 2019 at 7:53 PM Jan Kiszka <jan.kis...@siemens.com> wrote:
On 05.03.19 15:45, roman.stratiienko--- via Xenomai wrote:
From: Roman Stratiienko <roman.stratiie...@globallogic.com>
Signed-off-by: Roman Stratiienko <roman.stratiie...@globallogic.com>
---
.travis.yml | 73 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 73 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 .travis.yml
diff --git a/.travis.yml b/.travis.yml
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..0807760f4
--- /dev/null
+++ b/.travis.yml
@@ -0,0 +1,73 @@
+language: c
+dist: xenial
+
+addons:
+ apt:
+ packages:
+ - gcc-aarch64-linux-gnu
+ - gcc-arm-linux-gnueabihf
+ - patch
+ - quilt
+ - wget
+
+env:
+ global:
+ - KDIR=/tmp/kernel
+
+install:
+ - if [[ "${KERNEL_VERSION}" == *-rc* ]]; then
+ KERNEL_URL=
https://git.kernel.org/torvalds/t/linux-${KERNEL_VERSION}.tar.gz;
+ else
+ KERNEL_URL=
https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v${KERNEL_VERSION::1}.x/linux-${KERNEL_VERSION}.tar.xz
;
+ fi
+ - wget -O kernel.tar.xz ${KERNEL_URL} && mkdir ${KDIR} && tar -C
${KDIR} --strip=1 -xf kernel.tar.xz
+ - wget -O /tmp/ipipe.patch ${IPIPE_URL}
+
+before_script:
+ - case "${ARCH}" in
+ "arm64") export CROSS_COMPILE=aarch64-linux-gnu-
+ ;;
+ "arm" ) export CROSS_COMPILE=arm-linux-gnueabihf-
+ ;;
+ "x86" ) export CROSS_COMPILE=
+ ;;
+ esac
+ - pushd ${KDIR}
+ - make -j $(nproc) ${KERNEL_DEFCONFIG}
+ - ./scripts/config -e CONFIG_IPIPE
+ - ./scripts/config -e CONFIG_XENOMAI
+ - popd
+
+script:
+ - ./scripts/prepare-kernel.sh --ipipe=/tmp/ipipe.patch
--arch=${ARCH} --linux=${KDIR}
+ - cd ${KDIR}
+ - make -j $(nproc) olddefconfig
+ - make -j $(nproc) all
+
+matrix:
+ include:
+ - env:
+ - ARCH: arm
+ KERNEL_VERSION: 4.20.7
+ KERNEL_DEFCONFIG: multi_v7_defconfig
+ IPIPE_URL:
https://github.com/devel-opi/linux-ipipe-arm-porting/releases/download/draft-v4.20.7/0001-Draft-version-of-ipipe-arm-ported-on-v4.20.7.patch
Ah, nice, a port to a more recent kernel. Do you also have a queue
according to
our noarch / arch split? Would enable reuse for other archs.
I not really understand the motivation having arch / noarch. Is the any
article on this?
See https://gitlab.denx.de/Xenomai/xenomai/wikis/Repositories
+ - env:
+ - ARCH: arm
+ KERNEL_VERSION: 4.14.85
+ KERNEL_DEFCONFIG: multi_v7_defconfig
+ IPIPE_URL:
https://xenomai.org/downloads/ipipe/v4.x/arm/ipipe-core-4.14.85-arm-6.patch
+ - env:
+ - ARCH: arm
+ KERNEL_VERSION: 4.1.18
+ KERNEL_DEFCONFIG: multi_v7_defconfig
+ IPIPE_URL:
https://xenomai.org/downloads/ipipe/v4.x/arm/older/ipipe-core-4.1.18-arm-9.patch
+ - env:
+ - ARCH: x86
+ KERNEL_VERSION: 4.14.89
+ KERNEL_DEFCONFIG: x86_64_defconfig
+ IPIPE_URL:
https://xenomai.org/downloads/ipipe/v4.x/x86/ipipe-core-4.14.89-x86-2.patch
+ - env:
+ - ARCH: x86
+ KERNEL_VERSION: 4.4.166
+ KERNEL_DEFCONFIG: i386_defconfig
Actually, we haven't tested 32-bit even on 4.4 in a while.
+ IPIPE_URL:
https://xenomai.org/downloads/ipipe/v4.x/x86/ipipe-core-4.4.166-x86-12.patch
Cool! This is a valuable step forward /wrt CI. How long do these builds
run
each, roughly? We scale by spawning a separate build per kernel, right?
You can check real builds on:
Patches on top of the master branch:
https://travis-ci.org/devel-opi/xenomai-fork/builds/501878686 (Ran for 28
min 59 sec)
Patches on top of the next branch (failed for some reason):
https://travis-ci.org/devel-opi/xenomai-fork/builds/502131163
Travis runs 5 parallel jobs simultaneously until other are pending.
OK, thanks. My concern is about when the time limits of Travis free builds may
hit us.
Jan
--
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT RDA IOT SES-DE
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux
