On Tue, Mar 1, 2022 at 7:17 PM Jan Kiszka <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 01.03.22 10:02, FJKONG wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, Mar 1, 2022 at 3:24 PM Jan Kiszka <[email protected] > > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > > > On 01.03.22 02:23, FJKONG via Xenomai wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > > > I am trying to apply xenomai patch to RT kernel, but there are some > > > conflicts. > > > I am not sure if xenomai can works with RT kernel, or should I > > remove RT > > > from kernel and then apply xenomai patch. > > > what is the right way to fix this? > > > > The easiest path forward right now is likely using 5.15 (with > dovetail > > patch), maybe even 5.16. There, the conflicts should be much smaller > > than with older kernels where the remaining RT patch was much larger. > > But I don't have information about recent attempts to make this > working, > > so there might be additional issues. > > > > Thanks for replying. > > > > Here is our story: we got bsp from other company, so the kernel version > > Then your bigger problem is likely not RT but those BSP bits not coming > from upstream, thus having questionable quality AND possible integration > problems with Dovetail. > > Yes yes, because I remove RT patch and then apply the dovetail patch, but some driver require function from RT patch. I will triy to get this done and test building later. > Can't you run your SoC from mainline? What is the actual delta to > mainline, 5.10 or latest master? > > not try yet, but I guess that's hard because the driver and dtb. Jan > > > is fixed already and the RT patch is already there. > > I can reverse apply RT patch now, but some driver error shows up : > > "write_atomic" is not found any more. > > so I am stuck on this error now. > > > > Which version did you try? > > > > > > I am using 5.10.41 > > > > Thanks > > Kong > > > > > > Jan > > > > -- > > Siemens AG, Technology > > Competence Center Embedded Linux > > > > -- > Siemens AG, Technology > Competence Center Embedded Linux >
