Totally agree.  Anyone voluntarily still doing Windows GUI development on
MFC is a masochist.


----- Original Message -----
From: "Herb Chong" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2001 10:18 AM
Subject: Re: Supporting C++Builder 4 and 5 issues


>
> i think that the 486 issue is a non issue for Windows.
>
> we also need full Borland support of Xerces for a cross platform product.
i
> would like to see an official set of project files become part of the
> distribution.
>
> Herb....
>
>
>
>
>                     william.l.hopper@
>                     us.abb.com              To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>                                             cc:
>                     03/28/01 02:21 AM       Subject:     Supporting
C++Builder 4 and 5 issues
>                     Please respond to
>                     xerces-c-dev
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> I am trying to pull together updates for the BCB4 files in CVS and create
a
> similar BCB5 tree for C++Builder 5 and I would like the community's input
> on a
> few issues...
>
> 1.  Am I correct that Visual C++ 6 does not declare the C++ standard type
> "wchar_t" as intrinsic like C++Builder does, which allows VC6 to think an
> "XMLCh" is the same, while C++Builder thinks they are different?
>
> 2.  Given the typedef problem above, is anyone building Xerces under
> C++Builder
> ^without^ changing the "XMLCh" typedef in util\Compilers\BorlandCDefs.hpp
> back
> to being "wchar_t"?
>
> 3.  MSDN, etc. indicates that the InterlockedCompareExchange API is not
> supported on Windows 95, only on later versions.  Secondly, in the
> "compareAndSwap" method in util\Platforms\Win32\Win32PlatformUtils.cpp,
the
> inline assembler section ifdef'ed for VC++ uses instructions that, I
think,
> are
> only valid for 80486 and later processors.  Is supporting Windows 95 the
> reason
> we are not using the InterlockedCompareExchange API method?  Additionally,
> does
> Xerces have a stated list of supported processors?
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to