... Ah; sorry; I misread the question. Copying a pointer to a node is certainly legitimate. How that's expressed is up to the individual binding. I don't have an opinion on whether the copy constructor is a reasonable way for this binding to express that or not. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Why not new DOM_Node? zartaj . majeed
- Re: Why not new DOM_Node? Joseph_Kesselman
- RE: Why not new DOM_Node? Evert Haasdijk
- RE: Why not new DOM_Node? Joseph_Kesselman
- RE: Why not new DOM_Node? Evert Haasdijk
- Re: Why not new DOM_Node? Hal DeVore
- Re: Why not new DOM_Node? David_N_Bertoni
- RE: Why not new DOM_Node? Joseph_Kesselman
- RE: Why not new DOM_Node? zartaj . majeed
