Also, since you are reading from a file, should you not be using the
LocalFileInputSource class instead .. that should hopefully take care of
very large xml files ...
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, June 22, 2001 10:23 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Separate MemBufInputSource as input
>
>
>
> I don't think there is. You'll probably have to use one
> MemBufInputSource
> and multiplex it yourself.
>
> Dave
>
>
>
>
>
> "Williamson,
>
> Siehnai" To:
> "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> <swilliamson@doc cc: (bcc:
> David N Bertoni/CAM/Lotus)
> ucorp.com> Subject:
> Separate MemBufInputSource as input
>
>
> 06/22/2001 01:19
>
> PM
>
> Please respond
>
> to xerces-c-dev
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
>
> I am using the MemBufInputSource as my input source for the
> SAX parser.
> However, my application will have to stream the data
> piecemeal as separate
> MemBufInputSource's to the SAX parser because of the size of the input
> files.
>
>
> For instance, a MemBufInputSource will represent only a chunk of the
> actual xml file. When the SAX parser reaches the end of that memory
> buffer, it will need to wait for the next MemBufInputSource
> to continue
> parsing rather than ending the parse or giving an error. Is
> there a way
> for the SAX parser to parse one buffer, wait, then parse
> another buffer,
> wait, and so on, until you tell the parser that this is the
> last buffer?
>
>
>
>
>
> Siehnai Williamson
> DocuCorp International, Inc.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
