"Murray Cumming" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Murray Cumming wrote:
> >
> > Tinny Ng wrote:
> > > I just worry, if we do this, will we eventually be asked to add "xercesc" to all
> > > the folders
> > > => include/xercesc
> > > => samples/xercesc
> > > => bin/xercesc
> > > => lib/xercesc
> > > => doc/xercesc
> > > ..... ??
> >
> > I don't understand why these others would ever be needed. It is only
> > needed for include because Xerces-C copies all its headers there to
> > simulate installation of headers. If you do that then you'd better do it
> > properly.
>
> Actually, it *would* be better to just rename src to xercesc and stop
> copying the headers into include.
That does seem like an elegant solution.
One drawback is that it does mean mucking with the CVS repo, though
(unless you want to remove and then add all the files back under
xercesc -- Yuccchhh).
I would definately vote for this approach over the include/xercesc
jas.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
