Not sure about the best way to bring this up, but isn't the buffer returned
by transcode() allocated with new[]? If so, the proposal is flawed, since
it is using free() and not delete[]... If this type of "solution" is chosen
to be implemented, maybe it would be best to localize the solution a bit
(perhaps a DOMString::deleteTranscodedData( char* pDataToDelete ) or
something along those lines), instead of providing a "free-for-all" (pun
intended) function...
-----Original Message-----
From: Murphy, James [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2001 9:31 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: Static build on win32
Read "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"'s bug submission [1]. He is proposing
void XMLPlatformUtils::Free(void *p)
That can be called to free memory allocated by Xerces (perhaps from a
statically linked CRT). Methinks this would solve your problem. Add on
yourself or wait for that change in the code base.
[1] http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3347
Bug excerpt:
+ Occaisionally, there is a need to create an application that is statically
+ linked to the runtime. Rather than building a custom version of Xerces
which is
+ statically linked to the runtime, I propose that a simple function be
added (to
+ XMLPlatformUtils?) to release memory.
+
+ I have implemented a version of this for my project, and found that it
works
+ very well.
+
+ void XMLPlatformUtils::Free(void *p)
+ {
+ free(p);
+ }
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Armistead, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2001 10:18 AM
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: RE: Static build on win32
>
>
>
> > What do you mean by "component"?
>
> In this case, anything that has a statically linked CRT.
>
> > Is Xerces a "component" ?
>
> Yes.
>
> > If so, how can I ensure that the strings are freed inside Xerces ?
>
> You would have to create a release function inside Xerces to do this I
> imagine.
>
> > Is there another way to translate between strings beside
> transcode() ?
>
> I have no idea, I don't know anything about the inner
> workings of Xerces I'm
> afraid. We use the standard DLL for Win32 and our own port for Win64.
>
> You will have to ask someone who knows!
>
> Peter
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
