"Juergen Hermann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sat, 01 Sep 2001 11:18:02 -0700, Dean Roddey wrote:
>
> >If you are going to do the James Clark type tests, you must use a parser
> >that does canonical output, are you doing that?
>
> No, I do not yet do output conformance testing at all. Those test results are purely
> based on the parse result (MUST be ok for valid files, MUST fail for non-wf tests,
> etc.). With output conformance testing, only MORE errors could be generated, I
> think.
>
> This is the current checks, I think they correctly do what http://www.oasis-
> open.org/committees/xml-conformance/suite-v1se/xmlconf-20010315.htm outlines as test
> rules in sections 3.1 to 3.4:
>
> msg = ''
> severity = 'HI'
> if type == "valid":
> if result and result.type != "W":
> msg = "Error for valid file"
> elif type == "invalid":
> if validate:
> if not result or result.type == "W":
> msg = "No error for invalid document reported"
> elif result.type != "E" and self.strict:
> severity = 'LOW'
> msg = "Error was not reported as recoverable"
> elif result and result != "W":
> severity = 'MED'
> msg = "Non-validating parser reported error for invalid document"
> elif type == "not-wf":
> if not result or result.type == "W":
> msg = "No error for non-wellformed document reported"
> elif result.type != "F" and self.strict:
> severity = 'LOW'
> msg = "Error was not reported as fatal"
> elif type == "error" and strict and not result:
> severity = 'LOW'
> msg = 'Optional error was not reported'
Hey Juergen,
This looks correct by my understanding. I looked at the pirxx page and
noticed that you're often recording two errors for the same test:
--- valid-sa-094 James Clark XMLTEST cases, 18-Nov-1998 (cf. 2.8) ------------
This refers to an undefined parameter entity reference within
a markup declaration in the internal DTD subset, violating
the PEs in Internal Subset WFC.
HI No error for non-wellformed document reported
xmltest\valid/sa/094.xml
None
--- valid-sa-094 James Clark XMLTEST cases, 18-Nov-1998 (cf. 2.8) ------------
This refers to an undefined parameter entity reference within
a markup declaration in the internal DTD subset, violating
the PEs in Internal Subset WFC.
HI No error for non-wellformed document reported
xmltest\valid/sa/094.xml
None
Is this one error for the non-validating, and one for the validating
parser?
Also, how are you instructing the parser to be
validating/non-validating? You need to use the setValidationScheme()
method and the Val_Always or Val_Never enums, or it won't work
properly. When I tried Val_Auto, I got lots of errors.
Can you run DOMCount/SAXCount from the Xerces-C distro on the tests
that are giving you errors to double check if any thing is wrong with
your installation (use the -v=always/never flags to set validation)?
If DOMCount gives a different answer, then it's the Python interface.
I have only run the validating parser. I'll run the non-validating
parser now and report my results.
jas.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
