PLEASE DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE. TO FURTHER COMMENT
ON THE STATUS OF THIS BUG PLEASE FOLLOW THE LINK BELOW
AND USE THE ON-LINE APPLICATION. REPLYING TO THIS MESSAGE
DOES NOT UPDATE THE DATABASE, AND SO YOUR COMMENT WILL
BE LOST SOMEWHERE.

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3170

*** shadow/3170 Tue Aug 21 08:43:44 2001
--- shadow/3170.tmp.25003       Tue Sep  4 10:53:26 2001
***************
*** 2,9 ****
  | URLs with ? type fragments in them don't work.                             |
  +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
  |        Bug #: 3170                        Product: Xerces-C++              |
! |       Status: NEW                         Version: Nightly build           |
! |   Resolution:                            Platform: All                     |
  |     Severity: Major                    OS/Version: All                     |
  |     Priority: Other                     Component: Miscellaneous           |
  +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
--- 2,9 ----
  | URLs with ? type fragments in them don't work.                             |
  +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
  |        Bug #: 3170                        Product: Xerces-C++              |
! |       Status: RESOLVED                    Version: Nightly build           |
! |   Resolution: FIXED                      Platform: All                     |
  |     Severity: Major                    OS/Version: All                     |
  |     Priority: Other                     Component: Miscellaneous           |
  +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
***************
*** 32,34 ****
--- 32,49 ----
  ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2001-08-21 
04:12 -------
  Created an attachment (id=431)
  This zip contains the two cpp files I suggest changing in order to fix this bug.
+ 
+ 
+ ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2001-09-04 10:53 -------
+ Quote from Kevin Philips:
+ <
+     I don't think the problem was that the fragment was wrong, but the query 
+ portion instead. I see there's a point about improving BinHTTPURLInputStream to 
+ use queries. ... which means that you check for a ? when getting the query and 
+ in BinHTTPURLInputStream::BinHTTPURLInputStream  deal with the query before the
+ fragment.
+ > #
+ 
+     Basically, if a urlsource object has a Query component, then put the 
+ question mark (?) and the content of the Query into the outgoing http stream.
+ 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to