Hi !
Thanx a lot for the replies !
// If you want it that finely controlled, you have to parse the files
// separately and then combine the DOM trees (import one into the other).
// Ciao, J�rgen
I will be using SAX, because it fits better into the approach my app uses.
// This is incorrect. The function of the entities is just so you can
// store the definitions in an external file. So the behavior is
// identical to what you would see if you had placed the contents of
// dtdfile directly in the internal subset, and xmlfile in the
// text. Therefore the contents of xmlfile are validated using the
// combined contents of test1.dtd and dtdfile. That is as tight a binding
// as you can get.
// jas.
I understand that this is just somekind of splitting the whole
XML/DTD-data into several parts.
What I meant to say was, that there is no exact binding of
TEST1.XML with TEST1.DTD, TEST1.XML is parsesd according to the
mixed information from TEST.DTD and TEST1.DTD.
So I can define elements from TEST.DTD within TEST1.XML, for example.
But probably using namespaces, as Erik suggested, will do the trick.
I have to look into this.
Best regards,
Hans Pesata
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
