"Jens Schilling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> some definitions in the file "GCCDefs.hpp" are wrong or
> unusable. Someone means the gcc-compiler does not understand L"",
> thats not right. And why do you use unsigned short instead of
> wchar_t? The L"" statement is of type wchar_t. It is easier use
> unicode strings with L"" instead of defining arrays of XMLCh.
Hey Jens,
I didn't write it, so I'm only guessing. Two reasons:
* this has to work with *all* compilers, so they needed to use a
common type, and wchar_t isn't supported everywhere????
* the person who wrote the header didn't know about L""????
Want to provide a working patch?
jas.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
