I believe that Rob Savoye sent in standard GNU build files for 1.3 about a year ago. Obviously they didn't become official. We could ask him if he would be willing to make them available somewhere. Of course that doesn't fix the way #include's are done.
Scott Mark Weaver wrote: > > I would find this change extremely welcome. The current random header file > location is annoying, to put it mildly, plus prone to potential collisions. > > This would seem to be the right place to post, but finding an active > committer here willing to take on changes seems to be rather a challenge! > > Mark > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On > > Behalf Of D. Stimits > > Sent: 10 October 2001 18:02 > > To: Xerces-c-dev > > Subject: Interested in getting changes into main Xerces distribution > > > > > > Where would I post, or ask for changes to the official Xerces > > distribution? Right now, the immediate change (and I can provide > > Makefile patches if desired) would be that make install fails to place > > headers for devel in any conventional location, and anything depending > > on Xerces ends up hard coding include paths to a tarball unpack of > > Xerces. For example, and this could be relocateable, make install should > > also install headers at /usr/include/xerces/ or > > /usr/local/include/xerces/ on Linux (and variations for most UNIX > > flavors). Is it possible to communicate with official developers > > concerning configuration and packaging issues? Is there a more active > > mailing list for such things? > > > > D. Stimits, [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
