Murray Cumming wrote: > > On Thu, 2001-10-11 at 18:49, D. Stimits wrote: > > Murray Cumming wrote: > > > > > > Part 1.1 Type: Plain Text (text/plain) > > > Encoding: 7bit > > > > Environment variables pass through to Makefile variables. Having > > environment variables set to some of the values, whether it is > > XERCESCROOT, THREADS, CC, or CXX, means you have done the equivalent of > > explicitly naming those values. Having environment variables set means > > you have not used a single default setting. To test what I am saying, > > one must not have Makefile variables set in the environment. > > Yada yada. If I'm not aware of having set any other environment > variables, is it likely that I have set any other environment variables? > > Not only > > have I also tested this, others have verified it. Your environment may > > be fooling you into believing there is no bug. > > If you read the mails, you would see that we have all agreed that this > *is* a problem when the prefix is not specified. Someone has already > posted a partial fix for this.
I empty my email at night before going to sleep. When I wake up in the morning, I average 270 to 370 new emails. I spend about half an hour fast deleting uninteresting stuff (90%), another half hour dealing with things I have to look at but which are quick (9%), and a few hours dealing with the final 1%. I tend to read and respond to things in the order they were received on that last 1%. About every 3 days I empty my email trash when it exceeds 2000 messages. So yes, I am aware of this, but wasn't at the moment of answering, it was out of chronological sequence. > > > > > D. Stimits, [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > PS: Having XERCESCROOT not default to the root of the tarball unpack, > > and having it require manual intervention, is clumsy. It interferes with > > clean install of Xerces-c within compound projects. No, it isn't a bug, > > but it would be better if a build didn't have to be told where its own > > location is in order to build, it could detect this easily enough if not > > manually specified. > > I agree. Do you have a patch to add this behaviour? No, but if it is possible to get changes in, I will work on it. Just takes time, and being convinced I won't waste my effort. D. Stimits, [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- > Murray Cumming > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > www.murrayc.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
