"Cornelius, Martin" wrote:
> I wonder about the current state of IDOM Development. It is still not > documented very well, and classified as 'experimental' in > http://xml.apache.org/xerces-c/program.html#IDOMProgGuide > > Is IDOM under active development at all ? Yes. IDOM was first released in Xerces-C++ 1.5.0, just about 6 months. It is still classified as 'experimental', just to allow more field testing and feedback. Since IDOM performs much better than the old DOM, it definitely will have more development focus next year. > > > It is really preferable to use IDOM instead of DOM in a server application > that demands speed, speed and again speed ? Yes. > > > Is there a special reason why IDOM has no userdata ? IDOM is designed to be more strictly w3c-dom standard compliance. Any non-standard interface extension are excluded in IDOM. > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
