That might not be too usefuli. The input sources are just low level streaming sources. They really only have one API which is "Give me more data, or give me death". So about all the testing you could do is to create a binary file with known contents, then write a program that calls that API on your input source and make sure that you get the data that was in the file. But in this case, the memory buffer input source is a well tested and much used class, so there's no need to do that. And as far as using it directly, that would basically involve writing an API parser :-), since the input sources are at the far, far end of the food chain, and the entire parser sits on top of them.
-------------------------- Dean Roddey The Charmed Quark Controller Charmed Quark Software [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.charmedquark.com "If it don't have a control port, don't buy it!" ----- Original Message ----- From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 1:55 PM Subject: Re: MembufInputSource question > > Alternatively, if you really do want to bypass the parser (eg, because > you're debugging and want to check that it really will deliver the content > you think it will), look at the API for that class and figure out how to > read the data from it directly. > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
