On Mon, 14 Jan 2002, John Utz wrote: > can you provide a tie-breaker? > > asserting that XMLSpy says it's ok is not really sufficient. I would > suggest bringing a third tool into the mix and see what happens.
I wish. If I could get a single tool to validate documents against my XML schema under Linux then I'd be happy! I guess the ultimate tie-breaker is the standard. I can't find any specific reference to recursive type definitions, so maybe that means it's allowed? Here's a thread on xmlschema-dev where people discuss a problem in a recursive schema and seem to think that once its fixed then it should work: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xmlschema-dev/2001Jun/0070.html > I am participating in another thread on the xerces-j mailing list wrt a > newly established XMLSchema standard that can't be validated against > xerces and i am beginning to suspect that XMLSpy was the only tool used in > the creation of this standard :-(. Well, XMLSpy is, as far as I can tell, the only fully functioning XML Schema validator in existence. If anyone would like to prove me wrong please feel free! I'd love to find something I can run from a regression test script under Linux. -sam --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
