Lenny, I haven't looked into your changes yet. But it is in my TODO list, and will do that within the next few weeks. I will let you know my comment, if any, by that time. Thanks!
Tinny Lenny Hoffman wrote: > Hi All, > > I don't know if anyone has had a chance to look at my proposed refactoring > (Bugzilla 5967) yet, but I attached to it a few more changes. > > I changed DOM_DOMImplementation from being a singleton wrapping a singleton > (IDDOMImplementation), to being a smart pointer wrapping any provided > IDOM_DOMImplementation. If none is provided then the default is to use > IDDOMImplementation. Now DOM_DOMImplementation follows the pattern set by > all the other DOM_* wrappers of IDOM_* classes. Along with adding > consistency, this change ended up being necessary to support pluggable > back-ends. I had been thinking that developers of alternative back-ends > would create their own DOM_DOMImplementation replacement, but that does not > work for DOM_Document, which needs to know how to construct a specific > DOM_DOMImplementation in its getImplementation method. With this change I > was able to change DOM_Document::getImplementation to construct the generic > DOM_DOMImplementation wrapper around the IDOM_DomImplemenation discoverable > from its wrapped IDOM_Document. > > I added a new method -- IDOM_Node *getNodeImplementation() const -- to > DOM_Node to allow access to specialized IDOM_Node implementations via > DOM_Nodes. > > Lenny > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
