The one problem we had with xerces 1.5.1 was that in the "release mode" build, the executable would crash whenever we tried to parse a file that did not exist. I traced into it but was not able to resolve the issue.
This problem could not be reproduced in "debug mode". I have not tested this in the 1.6.0 release. Samar Lotia -----Original Message----- From: Samar Lotia [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 4:44 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: Xerces C++ and Forte C++ compiler We have been using xerces for some time with the Forte 6 Update 1 compiler (plus a few patches) on Solaris 8. No noticeable problems so far, but then again, we only use a few small parts of xerces. The only piece we have used so far is the DOM parser. We parse our documents into memory and then immediately copy the document into our own structures. For our purposes, xerces has been fairly stable. Samar Lotia -----Original Message----- From: Woollett, Richard W [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 9:58 AM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: Xerces C++ and Forte C++ compiler Hi Guys, I wonder if you can give me some advice regarding using the Xerces C++ XML library on Solaris. I have been experimenting with the Xerces library binary distribution and the Forte C++ compiler (Version 6 Update 2) on Solaris (SunOS 5.7). I've noticed that the binary library works with the compiler when the compatibility flag (-compat) is set to 4 only. I'm interested in using the library with the compiler in standard mode (i.e. compat=5, ANSI/ISO version). To this end I downloaded the Xerces source code and attempted to build the library with the compiler running in standard mode. The library compiled and I've run a few of the example programs successfully, but I wonder how reliable the binary code is. I've looked at Sun's C++ Migration guide and I know there have been a few changes, most noticeably in the use of the "new" operator. Have you considered the changes between C++ 4.x and C++ 5.x and how they might affect Xerces C++? If so could you kindly let me know about your conclusions? Are there any plans for a C++ 5.x compatible library? I'd be very grateful for any advice you can provide. Many thanks, Richard Woollett --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
