I like this idea, but at the very least perhaps we could have a page with links on off http://xml.apache.org/xerces-c/index.html. This would probably be quicker in setting up and I'm sure would help a lot of people.
Gareth On Mon, 11 Feb 2002, Radovan Chytracek wrote: > May be it's the right time to consider a "contrib" feature of Xerces-C. I > mean to create a place where the various user contributions can be submitted > in a form of let's say Xerces-C extension DLLs or plug-ins. For example > XPath or XLink implementations working with Xerces-C could be the good > candidates for a user contribution. May be other features could come later > like XUpdate and etc.. > > Cheers > > Radovan > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Tinny Ng" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Monday, 11 February, 2002 7:13 PM > Subject: Re: xerces-c-1.7? > > > > > > > > "Jason E. Stewart" wrote: > > > > > Are there any new features to 1.7? My sense is that the main work has > > > been rounding out schema support issues, and perhaps patching memory > > > leaks. Please correct me if I'm wrong. > > > > The main work is sane_include. Khaled has also added SAX2-ext > > DeclHandler. Then there are a number of schema / IDOM / bugzilla fixes. > > You can check doc/releases.xml for more details. > > > > Besides we are working on some outstanding bugzilla bugs trying to include > > more fixes/patches before the release. > > > > > > > It would be very useful if you could publish an outline of the > > > direction that you see the project taking over the short term (say > > > three months) and the longer term (say one year). > > > > I think this is a good idea. May be we can create a file like > > "RELEASE-PLAN" or keep the file "STATUS" more up-to-date. And any active > > committers can modify them if committed to develop a specific feature. > > > > > Things seemed > > > clearer when your target was getting schema support finished, but now > > > that is done, I'm kind of at a loss to see what is happening in the > > > larger perspective, > > > > Right now, I don't have a concrete plan yet. Something in my mind are > > Short Term: > > - investigating Lenny's patch (wrap IDOM / DOM) > > - investigating other build's patch submitted in bugzilla like "creating > > static lib", "use soname in linux" ... etc. > > - more schema / bugzilla fixes and enhancement > > > > Long Term: > > - claim IDOM as non-experimental, and make IDOM as Xerces-C++ official DOM > > C++ Binding, and fade-out old DOM > > - add partial "DOM Level 3" support to IDOM > > - provide 64 bit binary distribution > > ... etc. > > > > However I don't yet have a detail plan with target date / release > > schedule. Once I have them more clear, I can create such files > > (RELEASE-PLAN / STATUS) and then start another thread in the mailing list > > to gather comments / input. > > > > > > > and the more clue I have the better I'll be able > > > to contribute to the project. > > > > > > > Any help is always appreciated and welcome. Besides those short term / > > long term items listed above, we currently have roughly 100 outstanding > > bugzilla bugs sitting there, any help in reducing such number is also > > appreciated. > > > > > > Tinny > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- Gareth Reakes, Head of Product Development DecisionSoft Ltd. http://www.decisionsoft.com Office: +44 (0) 1865 203192 --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
