Hi again.

Thank you. Now I'm trying to fix a new problem:

As I've seen on Makefile inside $XERCESCROOT/lib, HPUX has a curious way of
compilation, building a dummy executable before the shared library itself.
My compiler crashed firstly 'cos he cannot found a header named NodeImpl.hpp
on $XERCESCROOT/include/dom when building the dummy(required). The solution
was easy, taking it from $XERCESCROOT/src/dom.
But now It crashes again with the following error:

CC: error: type IDOM_Node defined twice in map files (763)
gmake[1]: *** [/usr3/xerces16/lib/dummyExe] Error 1

and then, when trying to build the .sl, thousand of errors like:

/usr/ccs/bin/ld: Data Linkage Table (+z) overflow in file
/usr3/xerces16/obj/HPUX/ptrepository/ArrayJanitor<char>.o - use +Z option to
recompile
   Reference from:
/usr3/xerces16/obj/HPUX/ptrepository/ArrayJanitor<char>.o(0x34)

(I've already changed the +z param to +Z)

I think this errors may be the reason for building the dummy executable, but
as the dummy cannot be built, no way of compilation. Any idea?

Jorge.

P.D. I do not need IDOM support, will removing it solve me this or other
troubles?


----- Original Message -----
From: "Bhavani Ravichandran" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2002 5:55 PM
Subject: RE: Building error on HPUX 10.20


> Hi,
> Your assumption is right. I had the same problem. After renaming my
> directories to shorter names, I was able to build successfully.
> Bhavani.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jorge Pozo Ramirez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2002 11:27 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Building error on HPUX 10.20
>
>
>     Hi there.
>
>     I'm trying to compile both Xerces C 1_6_0 on a HPUX 10.20 machine.
>
>     After building succesfully all object files, the compiler gives me an
> error when trying to link up the shared library: too many arguments.
>
>     It seems that the compiler (maybe the linker????) cannot handle so
much
> .o files as Xerces build. This doesn't seems reasonable to me, but I
cannot
> find another source of trouble.
>
>     Any idea???
>
> Jorge.
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
> ****************************************************************
> Este mensaje ha sido analizado con una herramienta
> de deteccion de virus para su seguridad.
> Ministerio de Justicia
> ***************************************************************


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to