Dave, Thanks for the clarification - I guess I misled you (unintentionally)
when I said
I needed to generate namespace aware XML, I did not mean that I needed a
namespace
aware DOM - but that the serialized output had namespace references.

Thanks,

Keyur

----- Original Message -----
From: "David N Bertoni/Cambridge/IBM" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 1:28 PM
Subject: Re: xerces DOM API: to NS or not to NS?


>
> If you create an element with createElement(), when you call
> getNamespaceURI() on that element it will return a null string.  So even
if
> you get the same output when you serialize the DOM, it doesn't mean the
> element is identical to an element created with createElementNS().  Some
> differences in the elements are not representable in serialized output.
>
> The "advantage" to using createElementNS() is that any namespace-aware
> applications that need to use your DOM will actually get a DOM with
> namespaces, not just elements and attribute that have names with ":" in
> them.  The prefixes are syntactic sugar, while the namespace URI values
are
> not.
>
> If all you're doing is creating a DOM, then immediately serializing it,
the
> difference may not be obvious.  But since you said you needed to create a
> "namespace-aware" DOM, then you _have_ to use createElementNS() and
> createAttributeNS().
>
> Dave
>
>
>
>
>                       "Keyur Dalal"
>                       <[EMAIL PROTECTED]         To:
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>                       >                        cc:      (bcc: David N
Bertoni/Cambridge/IBM)
>                                                Subject: Re: xerces DOM
API: to NS or not to NS?
>                       02/21/2002 09:51
>                       AM
>                       Please respond
>                       to xerces-c-dev
>
>
>
>
>
> It seems that both sets of API can lead to *exactly* the same output when
> the DOM
> was converted back into XML. I was only wondering if the NS API offered
any
> advantages
> in a situation where XML was being generated and not parsed or
validated...
> especially since creating a NS element would not necessarily create the
> appropriate xmlns attribute.
> e.g.
>  createElementNS( "DAV:", "D:prop" )
> would still require that setAttributeNS( "http://www.w3.org/2000/xmlns/";,
> "xmlns:D="DAV:")
> be called. And now I have the overhead of correct naming the namespace for
> my attribute without
> which the API would not work.( In my generated XML, I do not care about
the
> default namespace
> for 'xmlns' attributes ). The non-NS API allow me to simplify my code, by
> merely adding the
> the appropriate attribute and not worrying about the default value being
> right...
>
> Which is why I asked the questions - any benefits of using the NS
> methods...
>
> Regards,
>
> Keyur
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "David N Bertoni/Cambridge/IBM" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 12:10 PM
> Subject: Re: xerces DOM API: to NS or not to NS?
>
>
> >
> > If you want to create a document with the correct namespaces, you must
> use
> > createElementNS and createAttributeNS.  Isn't that obvious from their
> names
> > and the DOM recommendation?
> >
> > Dave
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >                       "Keyur Dalal"
> >                       <[EMAIL PROTECTED]         To:
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >                       >                        cc:      (bcc: David N
> Bertoni/Cambridge/IBM)
> >                                                Subject: xerces DOM API:
> to
> NS or not to NS?
> >                       02/21/2002 07:57
> >                       AM
> >                       Please respond
> >                       to xerces-c-dev
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > I need to create the following namespace aware XML document:
> >
> > <D:propstat xmlns:D="DAV:">
> >   <D:prop xmlns:R="http://foo.bar/ns";>
> >     <D:getcontentlanguage>enUS</D:getcontentlanguage>
> >     <R:lockedby>someuser</R:lockedby>
> >   </D:prop>
> > </D:propstat>
> >
> > If I use the DOM API to generate element nodes and append
> > attributes, what advantages are there in using createElementNS
> > and createAttributeNS over createElement and createAttribute?
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Keyur
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to