I don't know if this is helpful. I had problems with xerces on RH 7.1
because of C++ exception handling across shared libraries. I upgraded to 7.2
and am using g++ version 3 and the problems are gone.

-----Original Message-----
From: Bhushan Khanal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 5:03 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: Xerces 1.6.0 and RH linux 7.1


With redhat 7.1 there are some problems with exception handling when C++
code is dynamically loaded into non C++ programs. It might be worth checking
to see if you are running into this problem. 

Look at bug #37933.
http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHBA-2001-121.html

Bhushan

-----Original Message-----
From: Leonardo B. Lopes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 10:16 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Xerces 1.6.0 and RH linux 7.1


I downloaded the precompiled libs but got segfaults. Then I just
recompiled them from source and everything seems to be fine...

On Sun, 24 Feb 2002, Guy Pazi wrote:

> Hi,
> I've seen lots of questions regarding segmentation faults when running
> Xerces 1.6.0 over RH linux 7.1 and a bug report (3771) of the issue, but
> couldn't yet find an answer.
> Is there a Xerces version currently running over RH linux 7.1?
> 
> Thanks
> Guy
> 

========================================================================
Leonardo B. Lopes                                       [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Ph.D. Student                                              (847)491-8470
IEMS - Northwestern University              http://www.iems.nwu.edu/~leo


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to