I forgot about using XMLspy for testing because the same reason. It was NOT pure w3c Schemas.
regards, Alfredo -----Original Message----- From: Fernando Jeronymo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Martes, 05 de Marzo de 2002 02:04 p.m. To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: XML Schema Validation W3C Standard Ok. I have to thank you all that helped me. I am sorry but I don't remember the guy who told me: "Maybe XML Spy is too flexible?" or something like that. It turned out that he was correct. XML Spy lets you do whatever you wish with schemas. I downloaded XSV and finally my schemas are correct, and guess what? Xerces C++ Validates them!!! Thank you all! Now, just a small suggestion: Do you think we could have more verbose errors in the schema validation? It turned out that XSV gave me a more detailed description of the errors, so I was able to quickly find and correct them... in the other hand, Xerces gave me the same errors, but with less information about them... So if I had to correct them by the error messages in xerces I would be kinda lost right now. But this is a small issue. It works now ;) Fernando --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
